(chicks with guns)
"HAPPY EASTER......NO, WE DON'T GET DYED ANYMORE...OR SOLD AT THE K-MART...WE DEMANDED OUR RIGHT TO LIFE ! !


(chicks with guns)

"OH MAN ! ! THAT COP SHOT A TASER JUS' CAUSE I TOLD HIM HE SHOULD QUIT SMOKIN' ! !



HOLY COW ! ! SMOKERS ARE REALLY SERIOUS ABOUT BELIEVING THAT NON-SMOKERS ARE WRONG AND ARE VIOLATING THEIR RIGHTS WITH INSULT AND DISCRIMINATION....I'VE BEEN HELPING THE WRONG SIDE ! ! I DON'T WANT TO TEAR UP THE CONSTITUTION ! ! I DON'T EVEN TEAR UP MY COMIC BOOKS! I'M GONNA LISTEN TA' MISS DAWN AND LEARN THE TRUTH ABOUT HOW TOBACCO IS NOT HARMFUL TO YOUR HEALTH AS MUCH AS UGLY DISCRIMINATION IS !!

(thumbellina)




" I TOL' YOU GUYS THAT MISS DAWN WOULD BLOW A GASKET IF YOU STARTED DISCRIMINATING AGAINST PEOPLE'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ! ! YOU KNOW THAT DON'T NOBODY HAVE A RIGHT TO TELL YOU THAT YOU CAN'T DO A THING THAT IS LEGAL! AND DON'T NOBODY HAVE THE RIGHT TO ENDANGER YOUR IMMEDIATE HEALTH, BY THROWING YOU OUTSIDE, IN THE COLD AND RAIN, MAYBE NEXT TO THE FILTHY GARBAGE CANS, EVER'TIME YOU CHOSE TO HAVE A LEGAL SMOKE.....AND EVEN IF THEY OWN THE BUSINESS AND THE BUILDING, THEY OPENED IT TO THE PUBLIC, SO IT IS NOT THEIR PRIVATE HOME AND THEY CANNOT DISCRIMINATE AGAINST EVEN ONE OF THOSE PUBLIC VISITORS."



MY DEAR BRAIN-WASHED, MISGUIDED KIDS,

I LOVE YOU ALL IMENSELY....BUT....PLEASE READ THE LETTERS I SENT TO THE ADULTS WHO ARE MANAGING YOUR VOLUNTEER WORK FOR SMOKE-FREE AMERICA. I DO NOT AGREE WITH THEM, THAT IT IS HONORABLE WORK, AND I WISH YOU WOULD SERIOUSLY CONSIDER THE CONTENTS OF THE LETTERS AND DECIDE, IF YOU CHOOSE, TO PROTECT EVERYONE'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, MORE THAN THE CURRENT NON-SMOKERS WRONGS AND DISCRIMINATIONS AGAINST SMOKERS. LOVE, DAWN

I FELT OBLIGATED TO WRITE AND PUBLISIZE THESE COMMUNICATIONS FOR THE SAKE OF OUR KIDS, WHO ARE BEING TAUGHT PREJUDICE,DISCRIMINATION AND SELFISHNESS AND STAND IN DANGER OF REALIZING THE FULL IMPACT OF THE LOSS OF THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, IN THEIR LIFETIME,, AND THE LOSS OF THE RIGHTS IT GIVES US, AND THE TOTAL LOSS OF FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY THEY WOULD SUFFER, IF WE PERMIT IT TO BE CHIPPED AWAY AT.

THERE WAS A FAMOUS QUOTE, WHOSE AUTHOR SLIPS MY MIND, BUT IT SAYS IT ALL.....

"I MAY NOT AGREE WITH WHAT YOU SAY......BUT, I WILL TIL MY DEATH, DEFEND YOUR RIGHT TO SAY IT."

THIS IS FREEDOM OF SPEECH...IT IS A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT...NO ONE CAN FORBID ME TO SPEAK...NO ONE CAN DECIDE WHAT I SHOULD SAY NO ONE CAN STOP OTHERS FROM LISTENING.

THAT, THAT AND AGAIN...THAT IS FREEDOM. IT IS FOR ALL, IT IS UNPREJUDICED, IT PROTECTS YOU, YOUR ENEMY AND YOUR MOTHER-IN-LAW.......BUT WE WOULD NOT WANT TO HAVE IT ANY OTHER WAY !!!!!!!!!!

YOU CAN NEVER DEMAND WHAT YOU WANT AND TO HELL WITH WHAT OTHERS WANT. THEY HAVE FREEDOM AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AS WELL AND AS IMPORTANT AS YOURS. WE ARE EQUAL BY QUARANTEE OF THE CONSTITUTION.

DEMOCRACY IS NOT EVERYONE BEING THE SAME, DRESSING THE SAME, THINKING THE SAME AND VOTING THE SAME ..........IT IS THE EXACT OPPOSITE.

WE RESPECT, PROMOTE, SUPPORT, EXPAND, EVOLVE AND GAIN GREATER KNOWLEDGE AND WISDOM OF OURSELVES AND OTHERS THROUGH LIVING AND EXPERIENCING THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN US.

AND WE GATHER, ADOPT, AND ATTACH OURSELVES TO WHAT WE FINALLY FEEL COMPATIBLE WITH, AS THE BEING WE HAVE BECOME, BUT WE ALSO INVITE OTHERS TO GROW IN THEIR OWN SEPARATE, INDIVIDUAL BEING THAT THEY HAVE EXPLORED AND BELIEVE IN.

THEIR DIFFERENCE DOES NOT HINDER OR CHANGE OUR SAME 'OL SAME 'OL. AND WE WOULD DO NOTHING TO HINDER OR CHANGE THEIRS. LOVE DAWN


(life is about creating yourself)

 



"MY ORIGINAL PERSONAL PHILOSOPHY", BY DAWN NARET',
 P.O. BOX 2315, PITTSBURGH, PA 15230


"TO HEAR OR READ SOMEONE ELSES OPINION, IS PROOF OF ALIVENESS ONLY.....

TO MEMORIZE IT AND TELL OTHERS, IS A SIGN OF APEING ABILITY.....

TO EVALUATE IT AND SLICE OUT INACCURACIES OF IT, IS A SIGN OF INTELLIGENCE.....

TO PONDER, RESEARCH, ORGANIZE AND PROVE LOGIC AND THEN CREATE A MORE PERFECT COMPREHENSION, IS GENIUS"....AN ORIGINAL THOUGHT BY DAWN NARET' MARCH 2008



"'EY! I CREATED MYSELF! WHAT A PIECE 'O WORK EH'?"



****************************************

(PUBLIC SHARING OF AN E-MAIL I SENT TO ORGANIZERS OF "TOBACCO KIDS")

from Dawn Naret'
to: ADULTS IN COMMENTS DEPT./SMOKE-FREE AMERICA /ORGANIZERS OF TOBACCO-FREE KIDS(comments@tobaccofreekids.org)

date Jun 5, 2007 5:11 PM
subject Constitutional Rights Must Be Equal
mailed-by gmail.com

******************************************

Hello,

I am once again enjoining you, in the effort to eliminate the health dangers of cigarette additives in our environment. In the course of this effort, your organization has done an impressive job of organizing a national campaign, including youth volunteers.

As admirable as I consider this accomplishment, I am still disappointed in your violations and abuses, being dolled out to smoking citizens, as a result of your total disregard of the equal constitutional rights owned by smokers as well as non-smokers.

We cannot honorably, be teaching youths to steam-roll their preferences through the legislative process when those preferences are violating the constitutional rights of others.

I am enclosing a sample of lobbying to State Senators, that I have been busy on, for the purpose of taking this bannishment and punishment program off the backs of the smokers and placing the focus and accountability onto the manufacturers where it should have been to begin with. For some FACT FINDING INFORMATION, that you can use in your anti-manufacturing additives campaign, I will include also, a letter to the Allegheny County Executive Director that tried to help him avoid embarrassment before the State Of Pa BANNED his attempt to write smoking bans into county legislation.

You cannot continue to campaign for smoke-FREE environments, buildings, workplaces, businesses, sidewalks, streets and now private cars ( ?!!! ) when smokers have equal rights to engage in smoking in ALL these places, if they so choose and prefer.

The solution to non-smokers wanting protection should NEVER have been to banish smokers from society. This was an outrage that you will oneday regret. Whether you supported the actions in your political career or policies or whether you supported it with local smoke-free ordinances and laws.
(leaping frog)


"I GET TO SIT INSIDE...HA HA...YOU ARE A DIRTY THING, THAT MUST STAY OUTSIDE...HA HA ! YOU DON'T HAVE EQUAL RIGHTS PROTECTIONS...ONLY I DO ! ! YES, I KNOW EZELDA....WHY??"

The solution, should have been, from the beginning, justly placed to PROTECT the health and rights of ALL citizens and not just the health and rights of non-smokers. How much danger did you place THEIR health in by booting them out in the street, discriminating against them in housing or discriminating against them in employment?

How many lost their jobs, lost their income, became homeless or suffered health damage from exposure to inclimate weather and back of the building trash area environments while eating their lunch next to the trash dumpster? These results are despicable!!

Such attitudes and actions are a violation of the constitutional rights of smokers. They place the smoker on a level even below that of a porno shop, because the porno shop is protected to exist there, as they choose, according to their constitutional rights.

But the smokers, who probably abhore the thought of their presence in the neighborhood, just as much as anyone else, find THEMSELVES kicked out or prejudiced against, more than the porno shop owner, just because they choose to smoke healthy tobacco that, over-the-years, has been contaminated with chemicals that did not used to be in there.

You are OBLIGATED NOW, to regret those horrible prejudice attitudes and demands that you promoted, supported and steam-rolled through legislation, which caused personal, career, economical and residentual discriminations and injury, including health injuries from pneumonia, stress and inclimate weather exposure, to smokers, while being bannished outside buildings, while you sat comfortably, and warmly inside enjoying the protection to your health. SHAME ON YOU ?!!! You showed NO equal rights consideration, and it will haunt you, on record, to cast up record of your ugly head of "PREJUDICE ATTITUDE" one day in your career.

I want you and your organization to join the band-wagon to move this issue into the relevant areana of pressing for manufacturing fines and prohibitions of tobacco additives and off the backs smoking citizens. And I want you to apologize to the smokers for your TOTAL disregard for their equal rights and equal protection and reverse ALL legislative bans and demands against their freedom to choose to smoke ANYWHERE AND ANYTIME they choose.

You are an embarrassment to the democratic process with your original campaign direction. Make the apologies, erase the requests for bans and bannishments and save your reputations from becoming "DESTROYERS OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS".

No one will vote for a "COMMUNIST OR SOCIALIST DESTROYER OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS".

Please pick up the ball and punt your honor able intentions and actions ....to the moon.

Regards,
Dawn Naret'
Thank you for smoking or not smoking...it is your right to choose.,

Dawn Naret', Author of "We The People" Web-site, www.dawnnaret.blogspot.com

P.O. Box 2315
Pittsburgh , PA 15230-2315

BLOG SITES:
www.chagrinning.blogspot.com ("Chagrinning")
www.dawnnaret.blogspot.com ("We The People")
www.dawnnaret.blog.com ("58 year old Natural-Born Lady")
www.dawnnaret.wordpress.com ("Hey Buddy, Can You Spare A Latte?")
www.dawnnaret.workpad.com ("Fuel Cells for about 2 bucks", "Joplin Paraditty")
www.subatomicquantumhumor.blogspot.com ("Sub atomic quantum humor")
www.sokissmybutt.blogspot.com ("Smokers have rights too..so kiss my butt!")
www.stalkingcriminalsoninternet.blogspot.com ("Stalking criminals on internet")

EMAIL: 

dnaret@gmail.com 

(twin towers poem)







I WANT TO PROTECT OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS!!
I WANT TO PROTECT OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS!!

I AM NOT A SOCIALIST OR A COMMUNIST!!
I AM NOT A SOCIALIST OR A COMMUNIST!!

MySpace Stuff



*******************************************

Below are examples of portions of communications SENT:

to:jorie@pasen.gov

********************************************


Dear Senator Orie,

..........I am very impressed with the organizing you have accomplished with your smoke-free lobbying. I agree that we all must make a great effort to end these health hazards for everyone. I would like to join you in a collaborative effort. Now that we have enormous attention and focus of the string-pullers on the issue, we must bring the lobbying into the core of the theater (of war) the toughest arena of all and begin, to zero in on the source of the hazard.

That, of course, would be the cigarette manufacturers. We must eliminate their freedom to produce and distribute a health hazard product. We must lobby to create laws that prohibit, COMPLETELY, their freedom to process chemicals and additives into tobacco products altogether. We must give them NO ALTERNATIVE but to produce healthy organic products that will endanger no one's health. Studies have already proven that natural tobacco is not even addictive, let alone cancerous. It only contains a trace of nicotine, that is why, in my opinion, they add the chemicals, is to PRODUCE addiction. It does not occur naturally.

The tobacco plant, of itself, is not a toxic, addictive or poisonous plant. It is a natural, God created, domestic, green vegetation, ranking it the same as basil, parsley and oregano. Grasshoppers eat the leaves as the mainstay of their diet, including the nicotine. The natural nicotine is actually of such a low level it is not even addictive to many humans or grasshoppers.

It is these chemicals that are dangerous to the health of organic, mammal humans, not the tobacco leaf. Why then, are the manufacturers not properly addressing the problem, of health concerns, by eliminating the chemical additives and offering a clean, safe, organic product?

How many millions of dollars, a year, would they have already saved in law-suits?

How much of their profit could they have saved, on the overhead cost, of the chemicals?

How many customers could they have kept, if the product was not labeled a health risk?

How many new customers might be obtained, if the product were safe and even shown to have health benefits, when uncontaminated with chemicals?

All of God's green creations contain health benefits. Even those thought to be dangerous. Doctors now prescribe a green plant named cannabis, A.K.A marijuana, for over a dozen different ailments. At the turn of the century, circa. 1890, Doctors also used to prescribe cocaine for calming the nerves. It is also a natural plant. When I was a private nurse for Miss Helen Clay Frick,
Pittsburgh , Pa , The family never threw anything away.

Among the bathroom medicine cabinet items was a leather pouch, of glass medicine vials, prepared by the family physician as an assortment of "might need remedies" while the family was on cruise to Europe and could not be treated by their private physician. Among the vials was one, full of white powder, labeled "cocaine - 1898". Natural plants were always legal and accepted for medical treatment.

Cigarettes have been reported to ease, and in some cases, to stop the low to moderate chemical and or gas vapor induced lung and cardiac spasms. These spasms could cause instant death; in emphysema, asthma, C.O.P.D., CHF and cardiac arrhythmia patients.

I would like to see more research done on this, because I am convinced that the organic tissue, violently rejecting a chemical or gas vapor invasion, would be soothed by the counter-induction of organic vapor. The positive, expandable components, of the organic, super ceding the densifying and contracting physics of the negative. But this is only my personal, scientific theory of how cigarettes could actually be serviceable, as a health benefit, if left untampered with.

If we could all do an honest facts reality check and stop the false information, and terroristic rhetoric, the smokers would be healthier, The non-smokers would be safe and secure from any paranoia of being around smokers or cigarettes, and the manufacturers would be free of law suits and diminishing market share profit percentages.

That would be the wisest solution for the satisfaction of everyone. And it would end the discrimination and dangers of paranoia.

There might be one unhappy camper left, and that would be the chemical manufacturers and pharmaceuticals sales to sick patients, but ….they created the additives, the harmful to humans insecticides, disinfectants, solvents, etc…etc…etc. To that, the wise old sage, "KhanDawnUs" say; "the dog who bites….could end up with bloody tail."

I would hope that they would redirect their focus to preventative health enhancement, by producing safer protective products.

I personally wish to promote good health, extended life and the pursuit of happiness to every human. Lets all do a fact finding reality check and no one has to fear being banished 15 feet from the building.

We must erase the errors, committed against not only smokers, but against all humans and put an END to the violations of everyone's constitutional; civil, and human rights, before they are a lost and obsolete memory of Democracy.

Thank you for smoking or not smoking...it is your right to choose.,



Dawn Naret', Author of "We The People", Web-site,
AT: www.dawnnaret.blogspot.com

P.O. Box 2315
Pittsburgh , PA 15230-2315


ADDITIONAL WEB SITES:
www.chagrinning.blogspot.com
www.dawnnaret.blog.com
www.dawnnaret.wordpress.com
www.dawnnaret.workpad.com

EMAIL:
text.reply2dn@gmail.com
reply2dn@gmail.com
dawnaret@yahoo.co.uk


**********************************************

BELOW ARE PORTIONS OF A "RESPONSE" AS FOLLOWS:


**********************************************



jorie@pasen.gov

from

"Orie, Senator Jane" < jorie@pasen.gov>

to: Dawn Naret' < reply2dn@gmail.com>
date: May 23, 2007 1:22 PM

subject:
RE: CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS PATH PROTECTOR



mailed-by: pasen.gov




**************************************



"I definitely will look into-------and will have Kurt contact you to discuss further!" (END)


**************************************



JUNE 25,2007

BELOW IS A RESPONSE I RECEIVED FROM SENATOR COSTA, IN RESPONSE TO MY REQUEST THAT HE MOVE TO RESTRICT DANGEROUS ADDITIVES FROM BEING ADDED TO THE TOBACCO IN THE PROCESSING OF NON-DANGEROUS ORGANIC TOBACCO PRODUCTS.

Please redirect YOUR efforts from brow beating and discriminating against smokers, to protecting EVERYONE"S rights;

To purchase and consume legal products without censorship
OR discrimination
OR being criminalized
OR having our children snatched, from our home, because the parents dare to smoke in privacy.

This movement has been INSANE............ TO SAY THE LEAST,
AND THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN LOOKING FOR AN EXCUSE TO;

ERASE OUR FREEDOM,
ERASE OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS,
ERASE OUR DEMOCRACY,
AND SABOTAGE OUR SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT AND LOYALITY TO OUR COUNTRY, ARE TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THE OUTRAGEOUS PERSECUTIONS AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL DANGERS YOU ARE PROMOTING WITH YOUR CURRENT EFFORTS FOR A SMOKE-FREE AMERICA.

I ADVISE YOU TO REDIRECT YOUR FOCUS TO:
FREEDOM,
PROTECTION OF EVERYONE'S RIGHTS
AND PROTECTION OF EVERYONE'S HEALTH.

PLEASE PROMOTE A COMMUNIST-FREE AMERICA !!!

You don't throw smokers out in the cold and you don't try to criminalize their reputation OR steal their children.

Smoking is only ONE excuse, the enemies of freedom are using to erase democracy. The next one could be an area that you are personally associated with, and see absolutely NO reason why they should be banishing , criminalizing and threatening to arrest you or take your children away from you.........But this is the planned and active agenda of the enemies of Democracy.

You WILL be just as much VICTIMIZED, as smokers are today, if you do not join your fellow citizens, especially those who smoke, and demand protection of ALL OUR Constitutional rights.

Working WITH you, for a safer America,
Dawn Naret'


Forwarded Conversation
Subject: Re: CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS PROTECTION PATH
------------------------

BELOW IS A RESPONSE I RECEIVED FROM SENATOR COSTA, IN RESPONSE TO MY REQUEST THAT HE MOVE TO RESTRICT TOBACCO MANUFACTURERS FROM ADDING THE DANGEROUS CHEMICALS AND ADDITIVES TO NATURALLY ORGANIC, NON-HEALTH THREATENING TOBACCO PLANT PRODUCTS

Forwarded Conversation
Subject: Re: CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS PROTECTION PATH
------------------------
From: PA Senator Jay Costa
To: reply2dn@gmail.com
Date: Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 2:52 PM

***************************************



"MAKE ME LOOK LIKE A HUMAN....I DON'T WANT ANYONE TO KNOW I SMOKE ! ! "



JUNE 25,2007


Dear Ms. Naret:
Thank you for contacting me to relate your thoughts regarding cigarettes and the current effort to ban smoking in public places in Pennsylvania. I appreciate your interest in seeing cigarettes made without additives so that they would be less addictive and more healthful for all who encounter them. I regret, however, that the Commonwealth does not have the power to regulate the contents of cigarettes. Regulating products that are traded in interstate commerce, as cigarettes are, is the exclusive purview of the federal government. I encourage you to contact those who represent you in the U.S. Congress to relate your thoughts on this issue to them, since they are in a better position to address your concerns.
Again, thank you for taking the time to contact me about this issue. Please feel free to contact me if I can assist you in any way.
Sincerely yours,
Senator Jay Costa, Jr.
43rd District
JC

**********************************************

LETTER TO ALLEGHENY COUNTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, MR. DAN "THE DRINK TAX MAN" ONORATO

( UNFORTUNATELY, I RECIEVED NO RESPONSE FROM MR. O..........
OR PITTSBURGH MAYOR, MR. LUKEY RAVENSTUKEY)


*********************************************

HERE'S A DOUBLE-HEADER



"DAM SECRETARY.....I TOLD HER TO NOTIFY ME IMMEDIATELY IF THIS LADY DAWN EVER HAS ANY SUGGESTIONS FOR ME, SHE HITS THE MARK EVERY TIME......I SEE THAT NOW ! ! "

("GET THAT SECRETARY ON THE PHONE....ON THE "DOUBLE" BUCKO!")
 


(jis practicing ball pitchin)



"HEY, MISS DAWN SENT US OVER...SAID YOU MIGHT BE INTERESTED IN A LITTLE GAME ! ! "


Friday, April 06, 2007
Open Letter To Dan Onorato -
Dawn Naret'
P.O. Box 2315
Pittsburgh, Pa 15230-2315

4-5-07

Dan Onorato, County Executive Director

I tried to forward you a copy of a very important article, but this contact system would not accept the size of it. Please read my copy of it A.S.A.P. at:
http://www.dawnnaret.blogspot.com/

This is not a typical letter to the Executive Director of County Government. It is being sent to you, for your protection. There is about to arrive, a stirring of angry demonstrations and revolts against violations of Constitutional Rights and discriminations against smokers.

It would be beneficial to you and your staff to read this very informative article and familiarize yourself with all of the valuable information, that could help you have clear confidence, to support smokers in the "Burn the Smoking Ban" conflict.

I realize that you could feel more obligation to support the preferences, of what you imagine, to be the majority of the constituent opinion. However, the majority often has cross-over voters, as you are aware.

If you are not able to influence the County "steam-rollers" to cease discrimination and abuse, and to get these illegal laws and policies completely off the books, in Pittsburgh City and County, you could very well witness a prime example of "Majority Leverage" going bad.

You are possibly not aware of just how illegal and discriminatory this new ban is and every rule or policy that tries to dictate the activity and choice of a consumer who is using a legal product, is an illegal policy.

And just as illegal and discriminatory is the on-going practice of loading unassociated taxes onto tobacco products, "where smokers have to pay to provide increased funding, but non-smokers do not contribute".

I guarantee you, that 100% of the smoking voters will turn on any politician who supports the continuance of these abusive dictates and practices. Their numbers may be considered the minority, but the non-smoking majority may not approve of everything on your record, and could be crossing-over to the smokers' side, at least on a general election debate. So, you cannot have a guarantee that their majority over smokers is a clear sailing majority acceptance of the ban and the continued abuses against the smokers.

A more appropriate and definitely more legal philosophy and policy toward non-smokers demands, would be the "if you don't like it leave..." practice, advised for theaters of "XXX" rated film rights and porn shops in unwelcoming neighborhoods.

How have these unsavory businesses survived?? Remember? it was because of their Constitutional Right to choose and exist. Are we expected to have any LESS democratic democracy protection extended to honorable, working, citizens, who just happen to smoke cigarettes, a legal product to consume?

The Honorable Judge, requires that you contact him and officially withdraw requests for dictatorial smoking bans, limitations, restrictions, prohibiting/monitoring policies, laws, rules, discriminations, prejudices, as well as; harassment and obstruction practices, within your offices and illegal housing and employment discrimination being encouraged, by your office, based on erroneous assumption of freedom to permit, conduct or support these violations of constitutional rights of smokers.

Regards,
Dawn Naret'

Thank you for smoking or not smoking...it is your right to choose.,

Dawn Naret', Author of "We The People" Web-site, www.dawnnaret.blogspot.com

P.O. Box 2315
Pittsburgh , PA 15230-2315

 
            
My-space.Info

"HAPPY EASTER......NO, WE DON'T GET DYED ANYMORE...OR SOLD AT THE K-MART...WE DEMANDED OUR RIGHT TO LIFE ! !

********************************************************************
 

                                           "BAN ALL BANS !!

OR THE COMMUNISTS, WHO VOTE FOR THEM, WILL ERASE OUR “CONSTITUTION”

This is an editorial by Dawn Naret’ P.O. Box 2315 Pittsburgh,PA, USA 15230-2315

EMAIL: text.reply2dn@gmail.com
 July 16, 2007

In My Opinion, This is the sad truth of where our Government representatives are standing right now.

They have actually allowed an issue, that is not even a legislative, debatable, issue, to stand as one of the main deciding factors of the completion date of the Pennsylvania Budget Agreement.

Where is the basic knowledge, all of these people learned in elementary school?

Did they not study the “Constitution Of The United States”?

Did most of them not even study those guaranteed “Equal Rights” demands when they proceeded through law school?

Were they off on “vacation” every time there was a dispute, in some reputable neighborhood, where a porno shop or unsavory XXX theater was intending to open a business, and they were attempting to block it?
 
What was the result, in EVERY one of these litigation disputes?

The unsavory SHOP OWNER WON !!

Why? Because, to block him, or obstruct his choice of type or function of business was declared, verified and extremely relevantly A CLEAR VIOLATION OF HIS “CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS!!

If you do not want to buy or view unsavory offerings….then don’t go there, don’t view their films or don’t purchase their products. But, the shop keeper WILL STAY, and you cannot ban him, obstruct him, move him out, or even dictate what items he may choose to sell or how to sell them or if he wants to permit smoking in his shop.

This is a prime example, that ALL of our politicians and legislators MUST pay attention to. We have, in this country a very serious WAR going on, ACTIVELY at this very minute, and none of them seem to be on the side of the American Citizen.

It is a WAR over cancelling the American Constitution and FORCING the American citizens to accept that this country is no longer a democracy and that they no longer have any rights! It is HERE NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!

The current steam rolling of creating bans against smoking and adjacent criminal prosecution , harassment, discrimination in housing and employment as well as, the worst “Communist/Gestapo” type tactic that has reared itself up, as an actual court decision..is the seizing of children from the home of smoking parents, in Ohio !!!!!!!!!!

Verification of extremely wide, organized efforts, to create a public “brainwashing” and a political “brain-deadening” to gain support for all things “UNCONSTITUTIONAL” and “NOT PROTECTIVE OR IN THE BEST INTEREST OF ALL CITIZENS”, can be seen all over the internet.

Below is evidence one of the organized movements, led by an “alleged” Boston doctor.
 
This steam roller lobbying is occurring in every state, the same as every other issue that the Anti-American “Communists/Gestapo, destroyers of our country’s ECONOMY and CONSTITUTION” has been swelling and spreading and disguising itself as “concerned citizens for a better America” or “protectors of everyone’s health”.

“Major Anti-Smoking Group Wants Parents Who Smoke Around their Children Referred to Authorities for Child Abuse"

A major national anti-smoking group is publicly calling for parents who smoke in the presence of their children to be treated as child abusers.

The group - Action on Smoking and Health (ASH) - is calling smoking in the presence of children the most prevalent form of child abuse and wants parents who smoke around children to be investigated as child abusers.”- (End of internet sample)

This, perhaps unfairly, singled-out campaign, is authored by Dr. Michael Siegel.

His group is listed in the quoted portion of the article and in another article by 20/20 TV investigation into the relevancy and accuracy of second-hand smoking dangers, I again found Dr. Siegel mentioned with a much appreciated, honest opinion that nullifies the complaints of smoke dangers in resturants, bars and public buildings: “Dr. Michael Siegel, a leading advocate of bans on smoking in the workplace because of the harm from daily exposure to secondhand smoke, says the 20 or 30 minute claims are ridiculous.

"If someone is just exposed for 30 minutes, it's completely reversible, and it's not gonna cause hardening of the arteries," Siegel said.” – END QUOTE

What these people do not seem to get, is that smoking is a personal choice. And perhaps, they don’t want anyone except THEMSELVES “Protecting Their Health” as a GUISE to cover reducing their freedom to choose and receive protection, by legitimate legislation, already written in the “CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES”, against job discrimination, housing discrimination OR HAVING THEIR CHILDREN SEIZED !!!!!!

Now, why, with respect and credit given to Dr. Siegel, at least, have I insulted EVERY campaigner for smoking bans????

Because, if the owner of a porn shop can exist, indoors, in whatever capacity or activity he chooses, in any building or neighborhood he chooses, WHY AM I NOT GETTING THE SAME BENEFIT OF MY “ EQUAL” Constitutional Rights to his??

Is it because there is now a majority count of non-smokers verses smokers?

WHO CARES !!!!!!!!!

Congress and the Senators may be able to enact new legislation with a 2/3 (two-thirds) majority… But the Constitution demands “EQUAL RIGHTS” not “majority rules”.

Just because you do not like something, does not mean that then no one should be allowed to do it, even if you vote on it as a majority!

You CANNOT ignore, erase or alter the EQUAL RIGHTS demand of the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

When you force smokers outside the building, in all weather conditions, including rain, snow, sleet and hail, you make them vulnerable to the possibility of IMMEDIATE illness. That possibility forbids you to protect the health of non-smokers by endangering the health of smokers.

This is a violation of equal rights and freedom of choice.

It is a mask to support and cover-up discrimination, harassment, segregation, insult, social slandering and dominatrics doctrine techniques, that teach racism, superior dominance and prejudice.

So why would I insult these people who support smoking bans? Because, IN MY OPINION they are: Trying to erode away at the very core of Democracy.

They are trying to weaken and phase out the Constitution of the United States. T

hey are dividing the national citizenry, into angry, “unequal”, prejudiced against, militants and revolutionaries that prefer to be simple God-fearing American citizens living in the land of FREEDOM.

They are promoting Socialism, communism, dictatorships, elitism and nazi prejudice.
 
This is what I see and feel when I hear of new avenues of discrimination creating more erosion of Equal Rights in this country. Is that what they mean for me to feel ??

I feel it and against every campaigner who is trying to enslave me in a non-Democracy system and I feel it against EVERY POLITICIAN who supports them and allows themselves to be manipulated by them and who votes for bans that help them eliminate our Civil Rights, our Constitutional Rights and our HUMAN RIGHTS.

This issue is only ONE avenue of their attacking the American Democracy.

It already has caused smokers to loose jobs, be rejected for housing and be banished from social gatherings.

How could ANY American POLITICIAN condone or support such abuses?

These bans set up a process of “CRIMINALIZATION” that they plan to implement as further abuse, reputation destruction and total life destruction of honest, loyal, law abiding citizens.

They have been slandering and attacking us, at places of employment, until we loose our jobs.

They have been slandering, infiltrating our businesses and frightening our customers away, until we loose our businesses, they have stalked us with terrorism trying to create mental instabilities of paranoia, until we are institutionalized as incompetent, and they have impersonated and disgraced many citizens until they have lost their job, their business and their home.

I have been a victim of several of these offences myself. Most recently, I was on a public Pittsburgh city bus and I was dozed off. The bus driver called the Bus Co. security guards to wake me, and the guard woke me up by hitting me more than 10 times. At least 6 times after I was awake a hollering for him to stop hitting me. When I demanded his company I.D. and declared that I am filing an official complaint of abuse and assault, he issued me a citation for “disorderly conduct” !

I was being physically assaulted and he issues ME a citation to intimidate and cover-up what he had done. Then, he told someone, that he had called, to PUT ME ON THE LIST.
 
I asked him what list and he told me it was none of my business.

Then, I appealed the citation and had a hearing with the magistrate. The magistrate violated my right to “DUE PROCESS” by not letting me testify that I was instigated to an angry verbal discourse, because I had been physically assaulted by this man. He cut off my speaking and said “that is irrelevant”.

I was found guilty and definitely appealed that decision.

I am fighting an attempt to “CRIMINALIZE” my reputation as an honest, honorable, law-abiding, loyal American. ( I WON THAT COURT BATTLE, SERVING AS MY OWN ATTORNEY, AFTER APPEALING TO THE SUPERIOR COURT. LOOK FOR ARTICLE TO COME, "THIRD BATTLE IN COURT SUCCESSFUL").

If you haven’t DONE anything for them to criminalize you with, they will FABRICATE it or FRAME YOU !!

This is the WAR that we are fighting RIGHT NOW against all of these ANTI-AMERICANS that are persecuting us if we do not join their party or cooperate with their group, which slanders and provides false witnessing against American Citizens, in order to steal their identity, their job, their business or their children !!!
 
I am of the opinion that any POLITICIAN who votes for these bans does indeed commit an “ANTI-AMERICAN” act.

I will not even be satisfied if they vote for EQUAL RIGHTS and cancel the state Ban Idea.
 
I want our Rights protected with a national, across the board, abolishment of any existing or proposed ban, of this nature that so violates the Constitution and promotes HOMELESSNESS, UNEMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION, PREJUDICE and DEATH of American citizens.


***************************************

LETTER TO LEADERS OF NATIONAL SMOKE-FREE LOBBY GROUP:


***************************************


Hello, I am once again enjoining you, in the effort to eliminate the health dangers of cigarette additives in our environment.

In the course of this effort, your organization has done an impressive job of organizing a national campaign, including youth volunteers. As admirable as I consider this accomplishment, I am still disappointed in your violations and abuses, being dolled out to smoking citizens, as a result of your total disregard of the equal constitutional rights owned by smokers as well as non-smokers.

We cannot honorably, be teaching youths to steam-roll their preferences through the legislative process when those preferences are violating the constitutional rights of others. I am enclosing a sample of lobbying to State Senators, that I have been busy on, for the purpose of taking this bannishment and punishment program off the backs of the smokers and placing the focus and accountability onto the manufacturers where it should have been to begin with.

For some FACT FINDING INFORMATION, that you can use in your anti-manufacturing additives campain, I will include also, a letter to the Allegheny County Executive Director that tried to help him avoid embarrassment before the State Of Pa BANNED his attempt to write smoking bans into county legislation.

You cannot continue to campaign for smoke-FREE environments, buildings, workplaces, businesses, sidewalks, streets and now private cars ( ?!!! ) when smokers have equal rights to engage in smoking in ALL these places, if they so choose and prefer.

The solution to non-smokers wanting protection should NEVER have been to banish smokers from society. This was an outrage that you will oneday regret. Whether you supported the actions in your political career or policies or whether you supported it with local smoke-free ordinances and laws.

The solution, should have been, from the beginning, justly placed to PROTECT the health and rights of ALL citizens and not just the health and rights of non-smokers.

How much danger did you place THEIR health in by booting them out in the street, discriminating against them in housing or discriminating against them in employment?

How many lost their jobs, lost their income, became homeless or suffered health damage from exposure to inclimate weather and back of the building trash area environments while eating their lunch next to the trash dumpster?

These results are despicable!! Such attitudes and actions are a violation of the constitutional rights of smokers.

They place the smoker on a level even below that of a porno shop, because the porno shop is protected to exist there, as they choose, according to their constitutional rights. But the smokers, who probably abhore the thought of their presence in the neighborhood, just as much as anyone else, find THEMSELVES kicked out or prejudiced against, more than the porno shop owner, just because they choose to smoke healthy tobacco that, over-the-years, has been contaminated with chemicals that did not used to be in there.

You are OBLIGATED NOW, to regret those horrible prejudice attitudes and demands that you promoted, supported and steam-rolled through legislation, which caused personal, career, economical and residentual discriminations and injury, including health injuries from pneumonia, stress and inclimate weather exposure, to smokers, while being bannished outside buildings, while you sat comfortably, and warmly inside enjoying the protection to your health.

SHAME ON YOU ?!!!

You showed NO equal rights consideration, and it will haunt you, on record, to cast up record of your ugly head of "PREJUDICE ATTITUDE" one day in your career.

I want you and your organization to join the band-wagon to move this issue into the relevant areana of pressing for manufacturing fines and prohibitions of tobacco additives and off the backs smoking citizens. And I want you to apologize to the smokers for your TOTAL disregard for their equal rights and equal protection and reverse ALL legislative bans and demands against their freedom to choose to smoke ANYWHERE AND ANYTIME they choose.

You are an embarrassment to the democratic process with your original campaign direction.

Make the apologies, erase the requests for bans and bannishments and save your reputations as "DESTROYERS OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS".

No one will vote for a "COMMUNIST OR SOCIALIST DESTROYER OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS".

<img id="BLOGGER_PH